![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Scottish rape laws.
Read them.
Trust me, I couldn't phrase it anywhere near as well as they have.
But just to convince you to click, here are some choice excerpts:
In Scotland, it [rape] can only be committed by males upon females, which appears to mean by persons biologically male at birth upon persons born biologically female.
Translation: If you're a guy, tough luck. You can't accuse anyone of raping you, because it couldn't have happened.
But where the accused has no involvement at all in producing the victim’s state of insensibility and where he happens upon her by chance and has sexual intercourse with her when she is totally unaware of his presence and intentions, then it cannot be established that she demonstrated unwillingness. Therefore, it cannot be shown that any force was used to overcome unwillingness which never existed in fact; therefore, there is no rape.
Translation: If you find an unconscious girl and fuck her, it's not rape.
What have come to be known graphically as “oral sex” and “anal sex” do
not qualify as rape and digital penetration is not sufficient to constitute rape.
Translation: Rape = penis into vagina with lots of violence or threats thereof. Nothing else counts. And that is why guys can't get raped -- they don't have vaginas! Wow. Groundbreaking theory there.
Just read it. I'm hissing, snarling and wanting to shake the fucking idiots who came up with those definitions, so I think this is about as much commentary as I can dish out.
Edit:
Lysander [PWNED, care of Fickle] says:
And then there's the added bonus of the fact that rapists were allowed to cross-examine their victims in court and use any and every bit of info they had on prior sexual history until the law finally was passed to stop that after a girl committed suicide after being cross-examined by her rapist for five days straight during which he wore the same outfit he was wearing when he assaulted her and made her hold up the panties she was wearing at the time for the court. Repeatedly. I hate them all and want them to die.
Trust me, I couldn't phrase it anywhere near as well as they have.
But just to convince you to click, here are some choice excerpts:
In Scotland, it [rape] can only be committed by males upon females, which appears to mean by persons biologically male at birth upon persons born biologically female.
Translation: If you're a guy, tough luck. You can't accuse anyone of raping you, because it couldn't have happened.
But where the accused has no involvement at all in producing the victim’s state of insensibility and where he happens upon her by chance and has sexual intercourse with her when she is totally unaware of his presence and intentions, then it cannot be established that she demonstrated unwillingness. Therefore, it cannot be shown that any force was used to overcome unwillingness which never existed in fact; therefore, there is no rape.
Translation: If you find an unconscious girl and fuck her, it's not rape.
What have come to be known graphically as “oral sex” and “anal sex” do
not qualify as rape and digital penetration is not sufficient to constitute rape.
Translation: Rape = penis into vagina with lots of violence or threats thereof. Nothing else counts. And that is why guys can't get raped -- they don't have vaginas! Wow. Groundbreaking theory there.
Just read it. I'm hissing, snarling and wanting to shake the fucking idiots who came up with those definitions, so I think this is about as much commentary as I can dish out.
Edit:
Lysander [PWNED, care of Fickle] says:
And then there's the added bonus of the fact that rapists were allowed to cross-examine their victims in court and use any and every bit of info they had on prior sexual history until the law finally was passed to stop that after a girl committed suicide after being cross-examined by her rapist for five days straight during which he wore the same outfit he was wearing when he assaulted her and made her hold up the panties she was wearing at the time for the court. Repeatedly. I hate them all and want them to die.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Brooms (http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/05/26/louima/) aren't damaging enough, even though they can cause so much more internal harm. Only a penis can really hurt you.
no subject
no subject
Because fuck, even if they were all male, what's with the "men can't get raped" attitude? Are you not a 'real man' if you're raped? Are real men only the ones that were born with the equipment to be able to rape someone, or are the ones that actually do it?
I just have no idea what the hell those people were thinking when they wrote those laws, except maybe that they wanted to be as old-fashioned and idiotic as possible without caring about who gets hurt.
no subject