Hey, look!

Mar. 3rd, 2006 02:55 am
fickle: (pro-choice mai)
It is possible to be worse than Bush!

How?

Easy. Ban abortion and only make one exception: If the mother's life is at stake.

And South Dakota did it!

Even Bush wants three exceptions - incest, rape and the mother's life being in danger.

Of course, now what everyone needs to worry about is that law being used to challenge Roe vs. Wade.

Oh, well, that and the fact that the Patriot Act got renewed. That's worrying too, don't you think? Our Senate passed it.

It's at times like that I question why I want to study in America, let alone live in it.
fickle: (sorry our president credit clearobscurit)
Demand Alito not be confirmed.

Don't let him make the laws. He doesn't deserve to have that kind of power, based on his past decisions.

Support the McCain amendment.

Directed at stopping torture, it's especially relevant right now thanks to the 'extraordinary rendition' case of Khaled El-Masri, a German citizen who was kidnapped during a vacation and transported, or “rendered,” to Afghanistan where he was drugged, beaten and held in secret for five months.
fickle: (damsel in distress)
I was going to make this an edit to my last post, but it stands on its own.

How to prevent rape.

Yes, I'm sick of those e-mails that tell me to carry umbrellas, watch what I wear, don't let myself be caught alone in a room with a guy - I'm sick of being told I should never let my guard down. I'm sick of being told that when rape happens, it's just a girl exaggerating or trying to cause trouble. I'm sick of having rape trivialized, to the point that the next person who tells me it's just a bit of unwanted sex is going to have to deal with me verbally laying into them until my fingers are too tired to type/my mouth is too dry to speak. What I'd like to do is gut them, to castrate them, then tell them over their screams that it's only a little wound, not to make such a fuss. Pain is in the mind of the perceiver.

If nothing else, that's what Take Back the Night rallies tell people - it's okay to grieve. It's okay to be hurt. There are going to be days when you can't drag yourself out of bed, periods of time when everything hurts. Smells can trigger flashbacks, sounds too. It's okay. It's normal. It's not what you want, it stops you from acting the way you feel you should, but it's what happens anyway. I'm not fostering a culture of self-pity here, but nor do I think that denying your own pain is productive. To slice away the part of you that was wounded in an attempt to be wholly clean and incomplete - no. Because then you lose, not just to someone else, but you lose part of yourself, and it's not a game because it's your soul and your mind and your heart, and if you let someone damage you to the extent that you have no choice but to cripple yourself just so that you can survive, then they're hurting you twice over, once for the inital incident and once for the self-sundering. And they'll never stop hurting you, because you'll always remember.

And I know I said 'when you let' right after protesting the use of the phrase 'she was raped', but the thing is, getting raped is not the victim's choice. How a person deals with that is their choice. Sleeping around, swearing off sex, hiding away, hating yourself- they're all different ways of reacting, some more destructive than others, some less. The latest rally had about 50 girls all jammed into a small room, and I know that wasn't everyone. I know there were people too scared to come to a private, Safe Space meeting. A full third of all females have to deal with sexual assault at some point in their lives; it's jumped up from one quarter. How long before it hits 50%, and then 100% so that it turns into a standard experience for women, as normal as having blatantly sexual propositions tossed your way by complete strangers when you're just walking down a street and trying to get home?

Go ahead. Say that I'm borrowing trouble. Say that feminism isn't needed any longer, that we're practically equal anyway and that rape isn't really all that much of a problem. Please do. I'd love an excuse to hit someone with my copy of I Never Called It Rape. Because it's getting worse. Not better. Worse. With all our supposed moves forwards, the fact still remains that the incidence of rape has gone up, not down.

And home's not safe either. A quarter of all families will have a child molested by a family member at some point; one million American women endure domestic violence each year. (And those statistics are on the conservative side). Not to mention that again, most rapes are committed by people that the victim knows - and yes, marital rape does count and it is possible to be raped by a boyfriend/crush/ex. Still counts.

If you say no, if you don't want it, it's rape.

That simple.

It doesn't matter who you've slept with before, it doesn't matter what you were doing when you said stop. It doesn't matter what you were wearing, what you drank, or how badly s/he wants you. If you don't want it, then it's your body and ultimately, your choice. When someone rapes you, they take that choice away from you. They don't make up your mind for you; a person's default is not 'yes'. They simply remove your chance to say 'no' by refusing to acknowledge it.

What it all comes down, basically, is that real men accept the responsibility to not harm another person, and it needs to stop going unpunished. I'm not an idealist, no matter how you stretch the word. I'm well aware of the fact that most victims aren't believed, and that even when it does go to court, it's hard to win a case, standing in front of a jury that'll judge you on how you act, dress and speak, operating from the assumption that you must have done something to provoke an attack.

I know that police prefer the victim to be battered black and blue, half-dead from physical violence, rather than deal with the tricky grey areas of physical intimidation and how if a girl knows her attacker is stronger than her, and that fighting back will just result in her getting raped and beat up both, she's more likely to give in without fighting. In my school, when we had a quick seminar about self-defense, we were told to fight as much as we could but not if we thought it would endanger our lives or if we couldn't win. One of the girls summed it up as "lie back and try to not think about it"; the girl I liked best fiercely said she'd carry a knife on her and "kill the fucker". In retrospect, those lessons were only for girls. None for guys.

If I'd been the girl then that I am now, I might have questioned that, asked why we get trained to defend ourselves but why they don't get told to not make it necessary for us to know such things. Back then, though, rape was barely even a blip on my register. It was only as we grew up that my friends started to coming to me, telling me that a friend of their father's raped them, that their boyfriend raped them, that it wasn't true they'd had sex [name deleted] because he'd forced her and she couldn't say otherwise because nobody would believe her...

Rape is underreported.

Rape is a weapon.

Rape ruins lives.

And 'no' means 'no'. Always. Always.

Oh, yay.

Nov. 21st, 2005 09:37 pm
fickle: (damsel in distress)
Latest rape statistics, courtesy of Amnesty International.

Here's a breakdown of the stats. Pay especial attention to the one that states that getting drunk makes it your fault for getting raped.

Devrushka decides to send an e-mail to her male friends for raising awareness about how rape really is a crime and not just a bit of fun that got out of hand. And how it makes no sense to blame the victim.

After all, you refer to rape in the passive tense. You don't say "someone raped her", you say "she was raped".

Women unite, take back the night. And remember that 88% of all rapes are committed by someone you know, not a stranger in an alleyway.

To end this entry on a stronger, more empowering note, check out Sars talking about a war against women. Like Xeney said, "when a woman walks the street at night, she's carrying her most valuable asset with her, the one that everyone wants to steal, like a guy leaving the house with one leg in a cast and a VCR tucked under his arm."

Know why I love Sars so much? She's angry, and not afraid to say so. She understands what it's like to feel helpless, and frustrated, to have it all swirl in your stomach and block your throat, not letting you even scream because it hurts that much to know you can hate so much without having any way to bury your pain. She doesn't care if she comes off as unsympathetic; she doesn't care if she comes off as hostile. She just wants to get her point across, like below:

"Please understand that I have felt that fury, a fury made even more powerful by my own powerlessness, a fury that I have to eat, a fury that won't make anything better for me unless I use it to defend myself, which I might not do successfully, which just feeds the fury until it tickles the back of my throat. Good girls do not daydream about planting a size-nine go-go boot in a man's solar plexus, but good girls get raped and beaten up all the time. So do bad girls. It just isn't fair."
fickle: (all your base credit unknown genius)
Elitism, or why certain people aren't wanted at the RP barbeque and why we don't give a damn if that means we need to lace our sauce with arsenic to keep them away.

Best part of her rant?

to everyone else: stop being so nice. Stop it. Seriously. BE a little more elitist. It's NOT TOO MUCH to expect your players to not only punctuate and use pretty words, but to be considerate of other players, or even, you know, funny, or awesome. Expect more. Look for more. You yourself will not become a better RPer surrounded by morons. You learn more and have more fun when you're surrounded by good, intelligent, witty RPers. I consider myself very lucky to have the group of RP-friends that I have now.

Read it, and rethink your own use of the word "elitist".

And on a more serious note, Kime talks about the JROTC, and is interested in hearing other people's opinions. Don't know what that is? Click the link. I haven't commented there yet, but that's because I'm trying to multitask at the moment since Savior named me his shopping guru.

That entry is currently f-locked. Apologies, everyone, I'll remove the strikes once it's open again. Instead of that, read about a horrific sexual assault case in Toronto. The OP claims that race is a factor, but what's getting to me more is the fact the victim-blaming being flung around, especially considering how long the abuse apparently lasted for.

Slut.

Oct. 30th, 2005 04:55 am
fickle: (Default)
Ah, "slut." A compact little word, forceful even in the way it sounds, starting out with a hissing sibilant and pushing off of the tongue through the L and U, and then that nastily crisp T. "Slut." Say it a few times out loud. Roll it around in your mouth. "Sssslut." "Sss…lllut." Say it again. Notice that it's difficult -- almost impossible, in fact -- to pronounce it neutrally. It's got a sneer built into it, that word. It's not as twangy and unthreatening as "tramp." It's not as easy to yell as "whore." "Whore" is built for screaming rage and dishes flying through the air, with a nice gusty H at the front and a big old roaring R bringing up the rear. Not "slut," though. "Slut" is muttered. "Slut" is whispered. "Whore" comes in like a punch, but "slut" tingles, like a slap. "Slut" hides behind the teeth. "Slut" is for when your back is turned.

"Slut" is for when you don't act like a lady. "Slut" is for when you sit with your legs apart. "Slut" is for when you wear it short, tight, without a bra, cut up high and down low and around the side, because, see, "slut" is also for when you have the nerve to enjoy your body in front of women who hate their own bodies. Don't strut. Don't dance with soul, or lick your lips. Don't look too good; don't think you look too good. Digging your own self is slutty. Making your own good time is slutty. Who do you think you are, anyway? Knees together, slut.

"Slut".

Read it, love it and never use that word again.
fickle: (damsel in distress)
Schwarzenagger vetoes gay marriage bills.

Oh, and there are still rumors circulating he's running for re-election and possibly later for President because obviously, the last actor we had for President just did such a great job.

Secondly, US image abroad has suffered.

Oh wow. Really? What with the hugest ever mass protests against one person and the fact that 58 percent in the BBC poll see Bush's re-election as a threat to world peace, I would have never guessed that America's actually unpopular now.

This isn't high school. It is not a case of being cool to be uncool. This is a case of a global community, of peer judgment and not of a bully stomping onto the playing field, stomping on the glasses of the geeks and insisting it's because they wreck grade curve so really, bullying them is okay!

Come on people. I lived in Europe. I remember how proud I felt to be able to tell people that I'm American. I remember daydreaming about living in America once I started college.

I don't even know when it was that I started realizing being American was a shameful thing; but I do know it had nothing to do with extra-marital blowjobs and quite a bit to do with someone's idea of diplomacy being to forget the soft words and rely on the big stick.
fickle: (without stain credit wickedchild_md)
Now, most of you reading my journal know that I'm all for free press. Hell, I blog. That in itself is a form of expression that could be curtailed theoretically.

You probably also know that I'm against the Bush administration's decision to allow the flag-draped coffins of soldiers to be photographed, mostly because it seems ridiculous that those people would have died for their country and we can't even see that.

You've most likely also heard me talking bluntly about the lack of proper war coverage and how everything is being censored horredously, as opposed to in the past when the graphic images of the war-zones allowed people to see how awful war really is.

However, there is a huge difference between legitimate journalism and trading pictures of mutilated Iraqi corpses for porn.

Click the link if you want to read about how not only have American soldiers been exchanging incredibly horrific photos for amateur porn, in a trade-off that's soiling not only the whole idea of a free press but also the reputation of the American army. Like they aren't already been viewed as Geneva Convention-violators and torturers, we now have to deal with them being so completely disrespectful and jeering to the people they killed as to trade photos of them for porn?

Come on.

This is the army supposed to be 'liberating' Iraq, the strong arm of American 'diplomacy'.

Excuse me if I missed something, but how the hell is blowing someone's brains out, taking a photo, then profiting from the first two actions for the sake of free porn a diplomatic action? I can't see it as anything but barbaric.

Normally, I would be happy that these photos are up. I'd want to know where the American equivalents are though if it was only the Iraqi troops being shown killed, but I'd be glad that at least someone was showing what a gory debacle war is.

Note the normally, because all bets are off when a photo of a man lying in a mess of intestines and brains is being used as currency to get access to chats with underdressed females.

Such a fair trade, right?

So nice to know the family of the dead Iraqi is actually getting something to relieve the pain of having lost him - except they're not, since this is for the soldier's personal profit, and even if it wasn't, who would honestly, truly feel better about the death of the loved one knowing that photos of their corpse can get you free porn?

I'd go into a little bit about what this could say about the cultural link between violence and sex, but I'll save that for another day in favor of spotlighting another issue: the American press is ignoring this travesty.

The owner of the site was interviewed by European journals (you know, those people that live on that small, cultured continent and are in still shock that Bush got re-elected?) and is quoted in the article I linked to as saying "I've done interviews with the Italians, the French, Amsterdam. ... They were very critical, saying the US wouldn't pick it up, because it's such a sore spot. ... It raises too many ethical questions. ... I started to laugh, because it's true."

Someone enlighten me here: WHAT ethical questions could this possibly raise?

Soldiers killing people, fine.

That's what they're paid to do.

It sucks, I hate it, and I'm completely against the war in Iraq but ethically, it's accepted as standard behavior for soldiers.

Soldiers killing people and exploiting the dead bodies, (and thereby violating the first law of the Geneva Convention which states officiers need to "ensure that the dead are honorably interred, if possible according to the rites of the religion to which they belonged" so nice going there with making us look like barbarians again), is wrong on a whole different level.

You want people to see what the war is really like?

Stop flaming anyone that posts real, unedited photographs of the results.

Let the media distribute it publicly.

Have it on the newspapers, show it on the TV.

What you don't do is make people go to a porn site, where disgusting captions such as "What Every Iraqi should look like!" accompany the pictures, turning what should be a shaming experience into a poor display of nationalism and inhumanity.

If this made you think, pass it on. I got the link from [livejournal.com profile] nefthoron, and you too can either write about it, or just link people back here. The media won't do it? Fine. We'll just create such a firestorm that they'll have to pick up on it eventually because people need to know what's going on.
fickle: (law knows no law)
On September 14th, the state legislature will convene as a constitutional convention to consider a proposed amendment, known as the Travaglini-Lees amendment, that would eliminate equal rights for same-sex couples in Massachusetts and replace them with separate-and-unequal civil unions. Lawmakers need to hear that the citizens of Massachusetts support equality for all. Please call your legislators today and tell them to reject this amendment!

Sen. Charles Shannon Jr.
Phone: (617) 722-1578

Rep. Patricia Jehlen
Phone: (617) 722-2676

Already two of the “top lieutenants of state Senate President Robert E. Travaglini” have gotten the message, and have said they will vote against their boss's proposed constitutional amendment. Now tell your state representatives and senators to follow suit. Urge them to oppose the Travaglini-Lees amendment that would roll back the civil rights of gay and lesbian Bay Staters!

Sen. Charles Shannon Jr.
Phone: (617) 722-1578

Rep. Patricia Jehlen
Phone: (617) 722-2676

In addition to the onslaught on basic rights that gay men and lesbians are facing in the Capitol, on September 7th, Attorney General Tom Reilly certified for signature collection a proposed ballot initiative to pass an anti-gay constitutional amendment that would strip same-sex couples of not only the right to marry, but any and all legal protections. This even more extreme and mean-spirited amendment is supported by Governor Mitt Romney, and several anti-gay and far right organizations that will be collecting signatures this fall in an effort to get the proposed amendment placed on the ballot in 2008. Because of the Attorney General’s regrettable decision, the fight for equality is guaranteed to be a long one, but it is vital that we stop the Travaglini-Lees amendment now, and keep the momentum on our side as we work toward equal justice.

-I snagged the above from People For the American Way, and am so going to be calling those numbers today, after classes. *ticked off* What the hell? California caves so MA decides, "Right, well, we're not special anymore, we'll just take that back?" Hah.

Yeah right.

We fought to get those rights, and Reilly & Romney are crazy if they think that we're just going to roll right over and let them be taken away without fighting again.

Profile

fickle: (Default)
Fickle

October 2024

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags